[OpenWrt-Devel] still remnants left around from deletion of LLVM back in 2013

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Sep 11 12:41:31 EDT 2014

  long story short: poking around llvm content in openwrt, which
looked really weird and eventually led me to this:

commit 9241c57193bb8af2c1f4944ee21249b927cfecff
Author: kaloz <kaloz at 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73>
Date:   Mon Apr 1 15:08:38 2013 +0000

    [toolchain/gcc]: llvm is marked broken for two and a half year now, nuke it

    git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@36145 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73

diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/Config.in b/toolchain/gcc/Config.in
index f83f83c..6cfde54 100644
--- a/toolchain/gcc/Config.in
+++ b/toolchain/gcc/Config.in
@@ -26,16 +26,11 @@ choice
        config GCC_VERSION_4_7_LINARO
                bool "gcc 4.7.x with Linaro enhancements"

-       config GCC_VERSION_LLVM
-               bool "llvm-gcc 4.2"
-               depends BROKEN
... snip ...

  but there are still some references to llvm in the source tree:

$ grep -r LLVM *
package/utils/busybox/Makefile:ifdef CONFIG_GCC_VERSION_LLVM
toolchain/gcc/common.mk:	$(if $(shell gcc --version 2>&1 | grep LLVM), \
toolchain/Makefile:ifdef CONFIG_GCC_VERSION_LLVM

  should those final remnants be removed? and what's with
"CONFIG_GCC_LLVM", anyway? is that a typo?



Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org

More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list