[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] [rb532] change default package set
leroi.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jul 8 15:44:18 EDT 2014
On 8 July 2014 21:37, Florian Fainelli <florian at openwrt.org> wrote:
> 2014-07-08 8:01 GMT-07:00 Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists at gmail.com>:
>> On 8 July 2014 04:17, Florian Fainelli <florian at openwrt.org> wrote:
>>> 2014-07-07 13:57 GMT-07:00 Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists at gmail.com>:
>>>> On 7 July 2014 11:52, Felix Fietkau <nbd at openwrt.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-07-05 00:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>>>> There could be no wireless interfaces but ethernets are on board.
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin <roman at advem.lv>
>>>>> Not taking this one. Adding kmod-via-rhine is unnecessary, since the
>>>>> driver is already built into the kernel.
>>>> Ok, true... though I don't see the point in keeping wpad and madwifi there.
>>> Could you resubmit with a more recent package set such as wpad-mini
>>> and kmod-ath5k for instance?
>> How about just removing wpad and madwifi? I understand that, most
>> likely, there will be some wifi card installed but it can be any
>> minipci card and some (like me) may not use any wifi cards at all.
> How about keeping it? By the time the RB532 was sold, ath5k driven
> mini-PCI cards were also sold, so they are likely to be still
> installed. Either way, I am fine with nothing, you have already
> dictated the use of 'eth0' as a WAN interface, so I guess that's a
> fair change.
Didn't know that I'm a dictator :)
If you are fine with nothing that would mean you don't care, but seems you do.
It's just that I prefer defining defaults only if they are really
defaults. Like if there would be onboard wireless or if rb532 couldn't
be bought without wifi cards. But by default they were sold without
any wireless cards.
Either way, seems that nobody but me (at least from the list) really
uses these boards, so, I assumed, that my micro-dictatorship would be
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
More information about the openwrt-devel