[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC] broadcom-wl: use CCMP by default for WPA (version 1)
zajec5 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 07:06:38 EST 2014
On 4 December 2014 at 12:14, Felix Fietkau <nbd at openwrt.org> wrote:
> On 2014-12-04 11:28, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 18 November 2014 at 12:19, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I can see multiple files:
>>> but they mostly don't contain any comments.
>>> I'm not sure how much it's worth to list unclear parts of that.
>>> It's confusing to have /lib/netifd/ and /lib/wifi/. It's confusing to
>>> have two APIs (inconsistent callbacks). I can't understand why even
>>> for mac80211.sh we keep detecting code in /lib/wifi/. There isn't
>>> anything documented in the /lib/netifd/netifd-wireless.sh. I have no
>>> idea how netifd <-> scripts communication works. What is handled in
>>> scripts and what in netifd?
>> You say that /lib/wifi/*sh is legacy layer. I can understand we need
>> it for Broadcom or similar. But what's the point of having mac80211
>> Also why do we have something like /lib/netifd/hostapd.sh? Isn't
>> wireless stuff supposed to be in /lib/netifd/wireless/?
> /lib/netifd/wireless/*.sh contains handler scripts executed by netifd
> directly. /lib/netifd/hostapd.sh is just an include used by
> The only reason that /lib/wifi/mac80211.sh is still there is that netifd
> doesn't handle detecting devices and generating default configurations
> for them. I have removed the actual device setup logic from it a long
> time ago.
> John is currently reworking device detection (including for wifi) - once
> that's done, /lib/wifi/mac80211.sh can be removed.
Thanks for your help!
One more question: what about file pointed by Hauke:
is this ever used?
Also: is my patch correct?
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
More information about the openwrt-devel