Update OpenWrt rules

[Rich Brown]

Hauke,

Thanks for the other changes.

> On Sep 16, 2025, at 18:11, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> wrote:
> 
>> * s/voters/members/g - I don't think we mean to create a distinction between active voters and active members - we should use the same term.
> 
> Yes we want to distinguish between these two roles. There are some people who are actively contributing, but not voting. We have the active member status and the active voter status. These are two different roles.

I would like to discuss this more because:

1. It's my sense that we have a number of "frequent contributors" who submit PR's on a regular basis. Active members review the code and decide what to commit. At some point, someone makes a proposal to make the contributor an "active member" which grants them commit rights, as well as a role in shaping the direction of the project (by voting).

2. It's also my sense that the proposed rules were designed to promote voting: "active members" would have an obligation to help guide the project by voting.

3. There is currently no definition for "active voters". If we must make a distinction, we need one. (But I don't understand the difference.)

BTW: I have modified my copy of the Rules to point to https://github.com/hauke/OpenWrtRules/blob/main/OpenWrt%20Rules.md so that edits can occur there. 

Thanks.

Rich