Revising OpenWrt Rules

[Fernando Frediani]

I do not agree all decisions need to be made *in* public. This is 
different from all decisions be made public which I agree.

Sometimes there are though decisions to be taken by the decisionmakers 
and that may be related to other decisionmaker, other people or 
institutions and it may contain very sensitive information to be 
disclosed publicly, so why not always is good it to be made in public.
There is a fair amount of trusted people to the project with different 
point of views. I think is fair to understand they will take the right 
decisions for the project even if it has to be decided in a more 
restrict event due to the sensitive information under discussion.

It should be up to the own decisionmakers to find out if certain 
subjects have be discussed publicly or not. As long the decision is made 
public later I believe is a good thing

Regards
Fernando

On 04/10/2020 12:47, Luka Perkov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 4:44 PM Paul Oranje <por at oranjevos.nl> wrote:
>>> Op 25 sep. 2020, om 13:52 heeft Sam Kuper <sampablokuper at posteo.net> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> I'm just a sometime OpenWRT user, so weigh this accordingly...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:01:36PM -0400, Rich Brown wrote:
>>>> Assorted stuff that I don't think is controversial...
>>>>
>>>> - All decisions need to be made public
>>> Can I propose something stronger:
>>>
>>>     All decisions need to be made *in* public.
>> +1
> +1 from me as well.
>
> Luka
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-adm mailing list
> openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm