zajec5 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 15:54:32 EST 2016
On 22 December 2016 at 13:42, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 December 2016 at 20:13, Jo-Philipp Wich <jo at mein.io> wrote:
>> - Are there any outstanding changes?
>> Is there important changes we should wait for before branching the
>> release? Is there pending stuff in the staging trees which should
>> absolutely go into the first release?
> 1) Possible brcmfmac fix
> I'm working on this for last few days, if that happens to work, it may
> improve brcmfmac stability.
Ignore that. I believe it's just FullMAC firmware bug I'm seeing.
> 2) Better support for tri-band devices in brcmfmac
> I didn't start working on this yet, but it should be easy and many
> people were complaining on this issue.
I have early patches for this:
> 3) Per device rootfs for brcm47xx
> Everything is prepared, I just need to make sure rootfs don't get
> bigger and then I need to specify packages.
I was worried there may be some bug, because adding
DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-ath5k
for one device affected rootfs size of all other devices.
After analyzing this I discovered rootfs got bigger because of two
files getting fatter:
If you think about this, it makes sense, because enabling ath5k
changed options used for compiling libiwinfo and hostapd. Compiling
hostapd with things like:
can obviously increase its size.
So after all it's not a bug and it was like this all the time if using
CONFIG_ALL. I'll work on brcm47xx target during next days.
More information about the openwrt-adm