Proposal, progress in merge discussion with OpenWrt
vincenzo.romano at notorand.it
Sun Dec 11 02:32:01 EST 2016
>From the LEDE (current) main web page I read that it started with the
"goals of continuing to develop superior software in an open
governance model and encouraging new developers to contribute to the
What I would expect from this merger discussion is OpenWRT value,
history and experience to merge with LEDE's.
What I would expect is OpenWRT to ditch the current project management
policy and philosophy and to fully embrace LEDE's.
If that's not the case, then it'd be better to keep the two projects split.
Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
2016-12-11 8:17 GMT+01:00 David Lang <david at lang.hm>:
> There have obviously been a lot of discussions about a merge, we see that
> the plan is to merge the OpenWRT changes into the LEDE repository, and there
> have been a couple e-mails about logistical things of merging resources.
> But I don't think I've seen anything about administrative plans.
> I am assuming that post-merge, the OpenWRT branding will survive (due to it
> being far better known) and the LEDE branding will fade.
> But what is going to change in how the resulting project is going to be run
> compared to how OpenWRT was run in the past?
> The two extreme positions (neither of which is likely, but both of which are
> possible) are:
> 1. LEDE devs are giving up running their own project and going back to the
> OpenWRT status-quo, but taking their changes with them
> 2. OpenWRT devs are joining LEDE and everything will run as LEDE has run,
> just taking over the name and existing resources of OpenWRT
> I expect that the reality is somewhere in between, but I haven't seen
> anything about what is being planned.
> It's very possible that I've missed something, and if so, please point me at
> what I've missed.
> David Lang
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 07:26:18 +0100
>> From: John Crispin <john at phrozen.org>
>> To: Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>
>> Cc: LEDE Project Administration <lede-adm at lists.infradead.org>,
>> OpenWrt Internal Developer List <openwrt-hackers at lists.openwrt.org>,
>> Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name>
>> Subject: Re: Proposal, progress in merge discussion with OpenWrt
>> On 11/12/2016 04:46, Rich Brown wrote:
>>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 4:37 AM, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>>> with no vetos or worries being announced, could the owrt guys please
>>>> send their ssh keys ? once the ssh keys were added you also need to add
>>>> yourselves to the keyring.git tree. there was a howto that might not yet
>>>> have been moved to the wiki. i'll try to figure that one out today.
>>> I believe the two pages that are relevant are on the wiki:
>>> https://lede-project.org/docs/user-guide/signatures and
>>> NB: I believe the Public Keys page (top one) is unchanged from the
>>> original asciidoc, but all key holders should verify that their listed
>>> public keys check out properly.
>> i was looking for this page
>> -> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=web.git;a=blob;f=keygen.txt
>> lede-adm mailing list
>> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
> lede-adm mailing list
> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
More information about the openwrt-adm