Proposal, progress in merge discussion with OpenWrt
vincenzo.romano at notorand.it
Tue Dec 6 09:45:14 EST 2016
I see only positive values in such an approach.
Fragmentation won't help. Fragmentation will fragment also the user
base making both communities less relevant.
Thanks a lot from all you guys.
Thus it's a "go" for me.
Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT
cel. +39 339 8083886
tel. +39 0823 454163
fax. +39 02 700506964
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
2016-12-06 15:34 GMT+01:00 Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>:
>> On Dec 5, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name> wrote:
>> Hello LEDE team,
>> we recently had a very constructive discussion between the 2 project
>> teams regarding the next step of a more than likely remerge in the near
>> As a step towards that common goal, we all agreed, that consolidating
>> the two trees is the first and most important step that we need to take.
>> It was agreed that the easiest and fastest way to do so is merging the
>> delta from OpenWrt into the LEDE tree.
>> To make this work, we would like to grant LEDE commit access and voting
>> rights to Imre, Zoltan and Luka. To speed things up we would like to set
>> a 24 hour grace period for the very unlikely case of anyone wanting to
>> veto this.
> ACK for me.
> Thanks for all the work on this. I'll send a separate followup message with questions for the future.
>> lede-adm mailing list
>> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
> lede-adm mailing list
> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
More information about the openwrt-adm