Proposal, progress in merge discussion with OpenWrt

Vincenzo Romano vincenzo.romano at notorand.it
Tue Dec 6 09:45:14 EST 2016


I see only positive values in such an approach.
Fragmentation won't help. Fragmentation will fragment also the user
base making both communities less relevant.
Thanks a lot from all you guys.
Thus it's a "go" for me.
--
Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT
Information Technologies
--
cel. +39 339 8083886
tel. +39 0823 454163
fax. +39 02 700506964
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS


2016-12-06 15:34 GMT+01:00 Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>:
>
>> On Dec 5, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name> wrote:
>>
>> Hello LEDE team,
>>
>> we recently had a very constructive discussion between the 2 project
>> teams regarding the next step of a more than likely remerge in the near
>> future.
>>
>> As a step towards that common goal, we all agreed, that consolidating
>> the two trees is the first and most important step that we need to take.
>> It was agreed that the easiest and fastest way to do so is merging the
>> delta from OpenWrt into the LEDE tree.
>>
>> To make this work, we would like to grant LEDE commit access and voting
>> rights to Imre, Zoltan and Luka. To speed things up we would like to set
>> a 24 hour grace period for the very unlikely case of anyone wanting to
>> veto this.
>
> ACK for me.
>
> Thanks for all the work on this. I'll send a separate followup message with questions for the future.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Daniel
>> Felix
>> John
>> Jonas
>> Lynxis
>> Hans
>> Hauke
>> Mathias
>> Matthias
>> Rafał
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lede-adm mailing list
>> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lede-adm mailing list
> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm




More information about the openwrt-adm mailing list