[PATCH 04/11] dt-bindings: stm32: add st,stm32mp25 compatibles to the stm32 family
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Wed May 31 11:47:41 PDT 2023
On 30/05/2023 10:39, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Conor
>
> On 5/29/23 20:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:20:27PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>> STM32 family is extended by the addition of the STM32MP25 SoCs. It is composed
>>> of 4 SoCs: STM32MP251, STM32MP253, STM32MP255 and STM32MP257.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml
>>> index 4af5b8f4f803..7d7ca33d2e61 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml
>>> @@ -161,6 +161,15 @@ properties:
>>> - const: phytec,phycore-stm32mp157c-som
>>> - const: st,stm32mp157
>>>
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: st,stm32mp251
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: st,stm32mp253
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: st,stm32mp255
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: st,stm32mp257
>>
>> I assume the slightly odd format is just to avoid churn when adding
>> the board compatibles.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
I don't get it. How are you going to extend it? Or rather - what are you
documenting here? If these are SoCs, then this is not valid. We do not
allow these alone.
No, please drop it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list