[PATCH v11 10/10] tty: serial: Add Nuvoton ma35d1 serial driver support
Jacky Huang
ychuang570808 at gmail.com
Wed May 24 01:34:24 PDT 2023
Dear Jiri,
Thanks for your advice.
On 2023/5/24 下午 03:42, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 16. 05. 23, 9:52, Jacky Huang wrote:
>> +static void ma35d1serial_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Driver core for serial ports forces a non-zero value for port
>> type.
>> + * Write an arbitrary value here to accommodate the serial core
>> driver,
>> + * as ID part of UAPI is redundant.
>> + */
>> + port->type = 1;
>
> So this 1 translates to PORT_8250. Why not to use it directly? Or
> something more saner like PORT_16550A?
>
It's not actually 8250 or 16550A.
Can we add the following definition to
'include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h' and use PORT_MA35 instead?
#define PORT_MA35 124
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ma35d1serial_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct
>> serial_struct *ser)
>> +{
>> + if (port->type != PORT_UNKNOWN && ser->type != 1)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
> ...
>> +static int __init ma35d1serial_console_setup(struct console *co,
>> char *options)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = ma35d1serial_uart_nodes[co->index];
>> + struct uart_ma35d1_port *p = &ma35d1serial_ports[co->index];
>> + u32 val32[4];
>> + struct uart_port *port;
>> + int baud = 115200;
>> + int bits = 8;
>> + int parity = 'n';
>> + int flow = 'n';
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Check whether an invalid uart number has been specified, and
>
> You dereferenced ma35d1serial_uart_nodes already. Doesn't
> console=ttyNVT1000 (or something like that) crash the system?
>
I will add the following check before np =
"ma35d1serial_uart_nodes[co->index]".
if (co->index < 0 || co->index >= MA35_UART_NR)
return -EINVAL;
>> + * if so, search for the first available port that does have
>> + * console support.
>
> The code below doesn't match this comment.
Yes, I will remove the above comment.
>
>> + */
>> + if ((co->index < 0) || (co->index >= MA35_UART_NR)) {
>> + pr_debug("Console Port%x out of range\n", co->index);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32_array(np, "reg", val32, 4) != 0)
>
> Shouldn't that 4 be ARRAY_SIZE(val32) instead?
>
Will be fixed.
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> One \n here please.
>
Okay, I will add it.
>> + p->port.iobase = val32[1];
>> + p->port.membase = ioremap(p->port.iobase, MA35_UART_REG_SIZE);
>
> What if this fails?
>
I will add a check for the return value.
>> + p->port.ops = &ma35d1serial_ops;
>> + p->port.line = 0;
>> + p->port.uartclk = MA35_UART_CONSOLE_CLK;
>> +
>> + port = &ma35d1serial_ports[co->index].port;
>
> Isn't this:
> port = &p->port;
> ?
>
> Either use port on all above lines or drop the "port" variable
> completely and use "p->port" below instead.
>
I will remove port variable and use p->port only.
>> +
>> + if (options)
>> + uart_parse_options(options, &baud, &parity, &bits, &flow);
>> +
>> + return uart_set_options(port, co, baud, parity, bits, flow);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct console ma35d1serial_console = {
>> + .name = "ttyNVT",
>> + .write = ma35d1serial_console_write,
>> + .device = uart_console_device,
>> + .setup = ma35d1serial_console_setup,
>> + .flags = CON_PRINTBUFFER | CON_ENABLED,
>> + .index = -1,
>> + .data = &ma35d1serial_reg,
>
> I don't see console->data used anywhere in the driver?
>
I will remove it.
>> +};
> ...
>> +static int ma35d1serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct resource *res_mem;
>> + struct uart_ma35d1_port *up;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
>> + ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias/pdev id, errno
>> %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + up = &ma35d1serial_ports[ret];
>> + up->port.line = ret;
>> + res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + if (!res_mem)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + up->port.iobase = res_mem->start;
>> + up->port.membase = ioremap(up->port.iobase, MA35_UART_REG_SIZE);
>
> Check this too.
>
Okay, sure.
>> + up->port.ops = &ma35d1serial_ops;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_init(&up->port.lock);
>> +
>> + up->clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(up->clk)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(up->clk);
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get core clk: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err_iounmap;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(up->clk);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_iounmap;
>> +
>> + if (up->port.line != 0)
>> + up->port.uartclk = clk_get_rate(up->clk);
>> +
>> + ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_clk_disable;
>> +
>> + up->port.irq = ret;
>> + up->port.dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + up->port.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, up);
>> +
>> + ret = uart_add_one_port(&ma35d1serial_reg, &up->port);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_free_irq;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_free_irq:
>> + free_irq(up->port.irq, &up->port);
>> +
>> +err_clk_disable:
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(up->clk);
>> +
>> +err_iounmap:
>> + iounmap(up->port.membase);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> thanks,
Best regards,
Jacky Huang
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list