[PATCH 1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add ports subnodes in usb1 qmpphy node
Neil Armstrong
neil.armstrong at linaro.org
Thu May 4 08:39:18 PDT 2023
On 04/05/2023 14:57, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 04/05/2023 09:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3.05.2023 15:10, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Add the USB3+DP Combo QMP PHY port subnodes in the SM8350 SoC DTSI
>>> to avoid duplication in the devices DTs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> index ebcb481571c2..d048f4d35c89 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> @@ -2149,6 +2149,32 @@ usb_1_qmpphy: phy at 88e9000 {
>>> #phy-cells = <1>;
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + ports {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + port at 0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_out: endpoint {
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + port at 1 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_usb_ss_in: endpoint at 0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint at 1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + };
>> Shouldn't dp be a separate port at 2?
>
> Probably yes, but it should be the same issue for makena, but on makena
> we do not describe the USB SS and HS links separately, but only a single
> port for QMP input has been defined in the bindings.
Forget my comment, there's the 2 ports in the bindings, I was confused
after the bindings reviews...
Neil
>
> Neil
>
>>
>> Konrad
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> };
>>> usb_2_qmpphy: phy-wrapper at 88eb000 {
>>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list